I agree with this but no one that has a Rubicon front 44 wants to here it. Weld away.
After it being trussed [artec]. I'm not sure what I'd worry about. What failures have been recorded due to the apparent problems housing problems post C and trussed?
I'll hear it, but I don't feel my housing has kept me from doing much. While I don't get cool points for having an aftermarket housing, it's worked just fine for 65,000 miles and plenty of wheelin trips.
Yes, the tubes and c's are crap. Artec trussed and gussets, I feel pretty confident in it. I don't feel the aftermarket stock width is worth my time and money, at all. Unless there is a thread of beefed up and destroyed front d44s, I'll probably continue believing that.
I've been called many things, but naive isn't too common for me. My biggest gripe with the stock housing is the lack of caster. Hell I'm still on factory front axles, I suppose I am just not be hardcore enough to need anything aftermarket..because those just blow up all the time too.
I think we have two completely different thought processes here. A few think upgrading a factory housing to aftermarket is the best way to go. Whereas I feel like it'd be wasting money buying an aftermarket housing that did not get me more width, higher tie rod location, ring gear size, u joints, etc. I might as well truss and turn a stock axle, after that, I feel the aftermarket housing gains are negligible.