JKOwners Forum banner
1 - 20 of 24 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
26 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I am ready to pull the trigger on a 2011 Jeep JK. I have been doing some research and have made some tentative choices that I would like input on.

My Jeep will be a daily driver but I am not concerned with mpg. I'll be getting an automatic transmission. I will be doing some camping, fishing and shooting. Also some mild to moderate trail riding with the local Jeep club. For the most part I am function over form, but I do want my Jeep to look good.

I have picked out the Rock Krawler 2.5 Max Travel lift with Rock Krawler shocks. 35x12.50x17 tires. Probably Nitto Trail Grapplers. And 17" wheels obviously. Does anyone have any reasons the Rock Krawler lift wouldn't be the best choice?

I have looked over several bumpers, tire carriers, and rock sliders, but don't notice an advantage one way or the other really other than looks. I'll also be installing a winch just in case.

My main question is Wrangler Sport vs Rubicon. Will the extra reduction in the transfer case, 44 axles, 4.10 gears, and lockers make that much difference for my purposes. I can get quick disconnects for the sway bar. Being able to do that from in the cab doesn't mean that much to me. Cost isn't a huge deal, but I don't need what I don't need.

With the 35" tires I may end up changing gears anyway with either the Rubicon or Sport to something closer to 5:1.

Is there anything I am missing for now?

Thanks.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,507 Posts
If you don't plan on doing any rock crawling, you can get by with a Sport, but the second you do get into some rocks you are going to wish you had bought the Rubicon.

The rest of your plan looks pretty sound. RK is a great lift with good service after the fact.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,708 Posts
be prepared for a huge debate over what gears to use for 35s... imo, if its in your budget, get the rubi, you never know when the extras will come in handy... good luck!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
96 Posts
I'd go with the Rubicon...
With 35's on a Sport, you will need to beef up the front D30 and spend on gussets/shafts/sleeves etc. and also you might end up getting the D44 aftermarket spending more later. Instead you can just get the D44 with Rubicon and not have to worry about any of that..
Also lockers are a useful addition. A lot of folks get rid of their e-disconnects and get quick disconnects and so e-disconnects are not really a selling point on a Rubicon for me, but the front D44 and lockers are...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
803 Posts
I don't see any Rock crawling in your "itinerary" so I'd say save your money and get the Sport.
Only advantages with a rubicon, you get a Rubicon sticker and have selectable lockers.
The front D44 has the same outer C's and axle tubing as the D30 so you'll have to reinforce one way or another if you think it's needed.
If you regear then you can throw in a TruTrac limited slip at the same time and you still will have money left over for other toys :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,105 Posts
This is what I did

I don't see any Rock crawling in your "itinerary" so I'd say save your money and get the Sport.
Only advantages with a rubicon, you get a Rubicon sticker and have selectable lockers.
The front D44 has the same outer C's and axle tubing as the D30 so you'll have to reinforce one way or another if you think it's needed.
If you regear then you can throw in a TruTrac limited slip at the same time and you still will have money left over for other toys :)
Went with the Sport because I wanted to change some things and did not see the additional cost of a RUBI being my best choice.

Good Luck with your JK !!!

:smokin:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
26 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
Thanks all for the input. After doing some more research about what it would take to bring my Jeep up to a Rubicon later if I did not buy one now, it seems a lot more cost effective just to do it now. Then if I do get into the off road thing a little more than I expect, I'll be more ready with the Rubi.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
530 Posts
I bought the rubi so I could have locked d44's front and back and the 4:1 transfer case right away and pay for them over 5 years.
 

·
The Wheelin Man's Friend
Joined
·
8,653 Posts
You made a great move with the Rock Krawler 2.5" Max Travel. It is easily upgradeable if you want more height and will clear 35s with stock fenders nicely.

The front axle, transfer case, and 4.10s from the factory are nice to have, especially with 35s in your future. Go Rubicon IMO. Having driven a few JKs with 4.10s and 35s, they are much more bearable than 35s and 3.73s that you'd have in the Sport.

I like the Nitto Trail Grappler MTs, but do beware that they are a load range E, 10 ply tire in a 35/12.50R17. This could translate into a little rougher ride but you probably won't notice. I run the 37s on my JK and am very, very pleased with their performance so far.

If you have any more questions don't hesitate to ask. :) We all have opinions but your best interest is all we have in mind.

Marcus
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,729 Posts
Wait and get a 2012.. save your money while the suspension companies come out with their new stuff for it.. thats what I would do this late in the year.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,112 Posts
Wait and get a 2012.. save your money while the suspension companies come out with their new stuff for it.. thats what I would do this late in the year.
I agree.

You might as well wait for 2012 and at least see what is next.

Worst case senario if you don't like it you can probably find a 2011 cheap
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
26 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
The most information I could find about the 2012 wrangler was a .1 inch longer wheelbase on the 2 door (what I am looking at), a 5 speed auto instead of 4, the 3.6L 290hp motor, and an optional full time 4wd transfer case for the masses. The motor would also be further back in the vehicle and the tranny would be 3 inches longer. The configuration would mean a more aerodynamic windshield.

While all of these things are nice, none of them are necessarily reasons I would wait for a 2012. Looks like most info is pointing towards first 2012 wranglers hitting dealers mid August, and en masse mid September. Not sure I want to wait that long to get into a new vehicle. But certainly something to think about. Maybe I'll wait until info gets more concrete.

Thanks again guys.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,486 Posts
Stoney, another positive thing with the 2012's is the gas mileage is suppose to be increased as well, if ya care about that. Obviously cannot confirm that is true but have it from a pretty reliable source.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,729 Posts
The most information I could find about the 2012 wrangler was a .1 inch longer wheelbase on the 2 door (what I am looking at), a 5 speed auto instead of 4, the 3.6L 290hp motor, and an optional full time 4wd transfer case for the masses. The motor would also be further back in the vehicle and the tranny would be 3 inches longer. The configuration would mean a more aerodynamic windshield.

While all of these things are nice, none of them are necessarily reasons I would wait for a 2012. Looks like most info is pointing towards first 2012 wranglers hitting dealers mid August, and en masse mid September. Not sure I want to wait that long to get into a new vehicle. But certainly something to think about. Maybe I'll wait until info gets more concrete.

Thanks again guys.
Almost a whole new platform... would be enough to make me wait. Hell, when we bought Jenna's 2010 and then a month later they made the announcement for the new interior in the 2011 and the Pentastar in the 2012 we were kinda bummed we didn't wait longer.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,229 Posts
"moderate trail riding" can get into more intensive quickly. Go with the Rubicon.
 
1 - 20 of 24 Posts
Top