Not sure I'd trust welded plastic with my gas.weld it back together.
I've had exactly th same thought thought, I'd happily accept a smaller tank to get it tucked up by the frame rail. A decent skid would be much easier to make then as well.
Not sure I'd trust welded plastic with my gas.weld it back together.
I think plastic can still be "welded", but I don't think I'd want to risk on the gas tank.Damn I forgot the tank was plastic. :bawling:
Plus with a rear bumper, a big spare back there, I'd rather have the weight of the fuel tank between the axles than hanging out at the back.It's a safety issue.
It moves it towards the rear, you can compensate with taller springs etc, but the CoG will now be further back. Not by much I guess, but maybe enough to effect going up some steep obstacles. Of course it may help with coming down someNot to butt in... but how is the COG changed all that much by shifting weight?
I tend to always wheel with a full tank, to avoid the pickup sucking air at the wrong time. That said, yes, it does change and my vehicle will lean slightly when it's got a full tank of gas.By the fuel consumption the COG changes as the weight of the gas is lessened,
But you'd be back where you started in terms of clearance, and clearance is an issue on 4 drs. Lower CoG don't help much when you are high centered and stuck.Then you can lower your suspention lift to get your COG back and still have enough room to flex and build a skid plate that is flat.
A shallower fuel cell with a good skid plate would be the ideal solution in my view.What about building an aluminium fuel cell that is slightly shorter to fit in the stock location. Basically build a Genright fuel cell for the JK. Design it to where it tucks up into the frame rails. You wouldn't lose much capacity.