da Gubment is gonna decide if/where you can fish for you - JKowners.com : Jeep Wrangler JK Forum
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 7 Old 03-09-2010, 03:00 PM Thread Starter
JKO Addict!
venom's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East of Abilene, TX
Posts: 6,381
Feedback: 0 reviews
Send a message via Skype™ to venom
da Gubment is gonna decide if/where you can fish for you


The Obama administration will accept no more public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters.

AP/Luis M. Alvarez
One sign at the United We Fish rally at the Capital summed up the feelings of recreational and commercial fishermen.
This announcement comes at the time when the situation supposedly still is "fluid" and the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force still hasn't issued its final report on zoning uses of these waters.
That's a disappointment, but not really a surprise for fishing industry insiders who have negotiated for months with officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task force. These angling advocates have come to suspect that public input into the process was a charade from the beginning.

"When the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) completed their successful campaign to convince the Ontario government to end one of the best scientifically managed big game hunts in North America (spring bear), the results of their agenda had severe economic impacts on small family businesses and the tourism economy of communities across northern and central Ontario," said Phil Morlock, director of environmental affairs for Shimano.

"Now we see NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and the administration planning the future of recreational fishing access in America based on a similar agenda of these same groups and other Big Green anti-use organizations, through an Executive Order by the President. The current U.S. direction with fishing is a direct parallel to what happened in Canada with hunting: The negative economic impacts on hard working American families and small businesses are being ignored.

"In spite of what we hear daily in the press about the President's concern for jobs and the economy and contrary to what he stated in the June order creating this process, we have seen no evidence from NOAA or the task force that recreational fishing and related jobs are receiving any priority."


Fisheries In Danger
Consequently, unless anglers speak up and convince their Congressional representatives to stop this bureaucratic freight train, it appears that the task force will issue a final report for "marine spatial planning" by late March, with President Barack Obama then issuing an Executive Order to implement its recommendations — whatever they may be.

Led by NOAA's Jane Lubchenco, the task force has shown no overt dislike of recreational angling, but its indifference to the economic, social and biological value of the sport has been deafening.

Additionally, Lubchenco and others in the administration have close ties to environmental groups who would like nothing better than to ban recreational angling. And evidence suggests that these organizations have been the engine behind the task force since before Obama issued a memo creating it last June.

As ESPN previously reported, WWF, Greenpeace, Defenders of Wildlife, Pew Environment Group and others produced a document entitled "Transition Green" shortly after Obama was elected in 2008. What has happened since suggests that the task force has been in lockstep with that position paper.

Then in late summer, just after he created the task force, these groups produced "Recommendations for the Adoption and Implementation of an Oceans, Coasts, and Great Lakes National Policy." This document makes repeated references to "overfishing," but doesn't once reference recreational angling, its importance, and its benefits, both to participants and the resource.

Additionally, some of these same organizations have revealed their anti-fishing bias by playing fast and loose with "facts," in attempts to ban tackle containing lead in the United States and Canada.

That same tunnel vision, in which recreational angling and commercial fishing are indiscriminately lumped together as harmful to the resource, has persisted with the task force, despite protests by the angling industry.

As more evidence of collusion, the green groups began clamoring for an Executive Order to implement the task force's recommendations even before the public comment period ended in February. Fishing advocates had no idea that this was coming.

Perhaps not so coincidentally, the New York Times reported on Feb. 12 that "President Obama and his team are preparing an array of actions using his executive power to advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities."

Click here for archive
Morlock fears that "what we're seeing coming at us is an attempted dismantling of the science-based fish and wildlife model that has served us so well. There's no basis in science for the agendas of these groups who are trying to push the public out of being able to fish and recreate.
"Conflicts (user) are overstated and problems are manufactured. It's all just an excuse to put us off the water."

In the wake of the task force's framework document, the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation (CSF) and its partners in the U.S. Recreational Fishing & Boating Coalition against voiced their concerns to the administration.

"Some of the potential policy implications of this interim framework have the potential to be a real threat to recreational anglers who not only contribute billions of dollars to the economy and millions of dollars in tax revenues to support fisheries conservation, but who are also the backbone of the American fish and wildlife conservation ethic," said CSF President Jeff Crane.

Morlock, a member of the CSF board, added, "There are over one million jobs in America supported coast to coast by recreational fishing. The task force has not included any accountability requirements in their reports for evaluating or mitigating how the new policies they are drafting will impact the fishing industry or related economies.

"Given that the scope of this process appears to include a new set of policies for all coastal and inland waters of the United States, the omission of economic considerations is inexcusable."

This is not the only access issue threatening the public's right to fish, but it definitely is the most serious, according to Chris Horton, national conservation director for BASS.

"With what's being created, the same principles could apply inland as apply to the oceans," he said. "Under the guise of 'marine spatial planning' entire watersheds could be shut down, even 2,000 miles up a river drainage from the ocean.

"Every angler needs to be aware because if it's not happening in your backyard today or tomorrow, it will be eventually.

"We have one of the largest voting blocks in the country and we need to use it. We must not sit idly by."

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Originally Posted by My Wife
I might just go crazy and kill you in your sleep, instead of just planning it.
venom is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 7 Old 03-09-2010, 03:30 PM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 96
Feedback: 0 reviews

hehe, wow. not familiar with that situation, but I haven't seen divisive writing like that since wwii days. that's some serious manipulation the author is trying to pull off. fun stuff.
Bad_CRC is offline  
post #3 of 7 Old 03-09-2010, 04:13 PM
JKO Addict!
guinness's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Next Door To Some Shitheads.
Age: 45
Posts: 2,117
Feedback: 1 reviews

Originally Posted by Bad_CRC View Post
hehe, wow. not familiar with that situation, but I haven't seen divisive writing like that since wwii days. that's some serious manipulation the author is trying to pull off. fun stuff.
Yeah, the guy is such a wack job. I mean, really, would ESPN and the AP have picked up this story if there were any facts in it or cause for question.
I mean really, we fishermen shouldn't worry until after our rights are stripped, we should wait and worry then.

The AP and ESPN, this article might as well have come from Glen Beck w/ G.W. co-authoring.

Rest In Peace Guinness. You will never be forgotten. My brother and my best friend
guinness is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #4 of 7 Old 07-16-2010, 08:45 PM
Rock God
pastorsteve's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Denver
Age: 60
Posts: 660
Feedback: 0 reviews

If you believe what you read...........you shouldn't

Colorado Mountains = Land of Mountain Trails

And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love. 1 Corinthians 13

'08 JK Sahara, Jeep Green, BFG MT's, Pro Comp 4" Lift, Smittybuilt XRC8 Winch, Olympic BOA front & Olympic Defender rear bumpers, Olympic A/T Slider Rails, Spidertrax Spacers, SeatGlover Seat Covers, Bestop TrekTop, Husky Mats, Midland 75-822 CB, Magellan Maestro 3250.
pastorsteve is offline  
post #5 of 7 Old 09-05-2010, 07:14 PM
Rock God
fishgutz's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Triad region, North Carolina
Age: 58
Posts: 867
Feedback: 1 reviews

Actually, This administration is on a path to eliminate or severely restrict recretional fishing. Glen Beck could give two shots about fishing. He has bigge fish to fry.
Federeal registration is now required for recreational saltwater fishing. Next year it won't be just registration but a fee for license.
Why do people not think this could happen?
Every year econazis get more land closed to all human activity, not just ORV use. Why would they stop there? The more radical among them won't stop until most of us are herded into urban high rise government owned complexes. Thankfully, this group will live a life of unfulfilled fantasies. But never doubt that these squeakie wheels get a lot more political grease than we do.
fishgutz is offline  
post #6 of 7 Old 09-08-2010, 12:17 PM
PhilD's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,205
Feedback: 5 reviews

Originally Posted by fishgutz View Post
Federeal registration is now required for recreational saltwater fishing.
I fish saltwater exclusively and have not registered with any federal agency to do so. Is this something the states are doing and passing the info along?

I do have a HMS Permit, but that is only in case I catch one the fish covered, and most saltwater fishermen do not have one.
PhilD is offline  
post #7 of 7 Old 09-09-2010, 06:16 PM
Rock God
fishgutz's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Triad region, North Carolina
Age: 58
Posts: 867
Feedback: 1 reviews

New requirement this year in states that do not already require a saltwater fishing license.
This year registration is free. Next year it will cost. It is a new federal requirement.
fishgutz is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JKowners.com : Jeep Wrangler JK Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome