AEV/Magnuson Vs Ripp - JKowners.com : Jeep Wrangler JK Forum
 
JKowners.com : Jeep Wrangler JK Forum  

Go Back   JKowners.com : Jeep Wrangler JK Forum > JK Tech > Modified JK Tech Dept.

JKOwners.com is the premier Jeep JK Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2013, 09:40 AM   #1
eizenjin91
Rock God
 
eizenjin91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Member # 10362
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 771
Feedback: 1 reviews
AEV/Magnuson Vs Ripp

Just wanted to see what yalls thoughts are on the new AEV supercharger vs the Ripp. I know that the AEV is maxed out at 5psi of boost. Thoughts, experiences, opinions welcome.
__________________
'10 JKU - RK Arms - King 12x2.5" Front/14x2.5" Rear Coilover's - 40" Trepador Sticky - Superior 5.38's - D60 Front/Sterling 10.5 Rear - Warn locking hubs - Genright Gas Tank - Offroad Evo Corner Armor, Sliders, Front Stinger Bumper, Tire Cage - Poison Spyder Body Armor, Evap Skid, Trail Cage, Brawler Rear Bumper - Skid Plates - Warn 9.5 - Xenon Flat Fenders - Rigid LED's - Driveshafts - Etc. - Daily Driver
eizenjin91 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-06-2013, 11:31 AM   #2
rlanderton
Wheeler
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Member # 2429
Posts: 70
Feedback: 0 reviews
I went with the Ripp after researching for the following reasons, not all may apply to you however:
1. Have been around a long time with good reputation.
2. Vortech, the basis of their compressor has years of experience.
3. PRV is set to 8 psi
4. Best cost for entire kit, including inter-cooler
5. Least invasive install - no need to move oil inlet to way in back on opposite side by having to switch valve covers. No need to relocate power steering pump, etc...
6. Single stage of inter cooling - ie. air to air, not air to water to air...inherently more efficient from a thermodynamics view point and no need for a secondary coolant system and another point of potential failure.
7. Not convinced a positive displacement compressor will run as stock unit if the belt fails (how would air get to engine past the compressor lobes?) With Ripp, air easily bypasses the centrifugal compressor vanes in event of belt failure and installation of stock belt to get off trail...

Down side
1. Belt replacement takes a bit more work to loosen four mounting bolts to get larger belt back onto pulley
2. ALL superchargers will exhibit some surge when using cruise control
3. Requires use of high octane fuel 91 or higher
4. I found it necessary to tweak the Ripp tune to my application to reduce the surge when in cruise control
__________________
NRA Lifetime member
It takes a special kind of stupid to think criminals will follow gun laws...

08 JK Red - NV241OR Tcase, Ripp GenII, 3"OME lift and Nitrocharger shocks, JKS F/R adj trackbars, Rockrawler UF adj CAs, Teraflex UR adj CAs, Ruggid Ridge Modular front bumper with M8000, Olympic rock rails and rear bumper, BFG KMs

Last edited by rlanderton; 05-07-2013 at 06:07 PM.
rlanderton is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-06-2013, 05:38 PM   #3
bo9roadking
Wheeler
 
bo9roadking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Member # 16657
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 77
Garage
Feedback: 0 reviews
This is speculation on my part based on researching an SC for my 2012 JKU when it becomes available.

I'm looking for more torque in the lower rpm range for easier starts getting my heavy JKU rolling and for rock crawling. The Magnuson will provide more of the torque at a lower rpm than the RIPP. When looking at the hp/tq curves for both, the RIPP doesn't produce much more than stock output until after 3k rpm from the dyno graphs that I've seen and then it starts to provide a significant boost. I don't drive my JKU above 3k rpm very often. With my needs, I think the Magnuson will work better because it starts giving a torque boost almost immediately.

Of course with the RIPP giving more power in the higher rpm curve, it would work well for where my JKU is gutless. When I'm on the Interstate and I need to pass someone, the RIPP has the upper hand over the Magnuson. The Magnuson has already given just about max hp/tq in the mid rpm range, where the RIPP is just warming up and ready to provide extra power on demand for the passing situation or on the long steep uphill grades where I need to maintain highway speeds.

As far as boost pressure, the higher the pressure, the more stress on the internal engine components. If you are looking at more than 8 psi, you won't have a reliable engine for long. IMO, your SC choice mainly depends on how you drive and what rpm range you keep your Jeep in the most.

Last edited by bo9roadking; 05-06-2013 at 05:41 PM.
bo9roadking is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-06-2013, 05:54 PM   #4
rlanderton
Wheeler
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Member # 2429
Posts: 70
Feedback: 0 reviews
You are correct in that I installed the Ripp for highway driving, not off road. Off road it does not help much at crawling below 3 mph anyway. I have plenty of power for crawling with a 93:1 crawl ratio....again, it helps out an awful lot on the freeway, passing and the mountains of Colorado.
__________________
NRA Lifetime member
It takes a special kind of stupid to think criminals will follow gun laws...

08 JK Red - NV241OR Tcase, Ripp GenII, 3"OME lift and Nitrocharger shocks, JKS F/R adj trackbars, Rockrawler UF adj CAs, Teraflex UR adj CAs, Ruggid Ridge Modular front bumper with M8000, Olympic rock rails and rear bumper, BFG KMs
rlanderton is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-06-2013, 06:01 PM   #5
asphalt assault
Rock God
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Member # 12648
Location: Peachland, Okanagan valley, BC
Posts: 965
Feedback: 0 reviews
Based on this info I would go for the AEV unit. Imho
__________________
JKUR auto | 5:38 Yukon gears | 36" Irok radial | MT ClassicII 17x9 4.5"bs | TF 4" lift 2" boost = 6", monster Panhard bars | ASFIR bumpers, skids | SuperWinch EPi9.5 | RCV cv shafts | SC traildash | Xenon flat fender flares | plus others
asphalt assault is online now   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-06-2013, 06:32 PM   #6
1badjk
Granite Guru
 
Join Date: May 2012
Member # 21766
Age: 35
Posts: 235
Feedback: 0 reviews
I dont have either but I ride with someone that has the RIPP kit and I have had alot of superchargers in the past on other vehicles. The thing that would sell me on the AEV kit is that I would be gaining power at a lower range for crawling but I don't daily drive mine so I am not worried about highway boost.

If I drove mine daily it would be a tough decision, might actually go with the RIPP in that case because even with 5:13 gears this tank hates turning the 37"s.
__________________
2008 Unlimited Rubicon Black

RK 3.5 Max Travel:Fox Shocks:Fox Front Steering Stabilizer:Ace Front Stubby w/ Stinger:Ace Tubular Fenders:Ace Rear Bumper w/ Tire Carrier:Level 8 ZX Wheels:37-12.5-17 MTR-Kevlar:Engo 9K Winch:Currie Anti-Rock:Synthetic Winch Rope:6 panel sPOD:Rigid Lights:AEV Procal
1badjk is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-06-2013, 07:34 PM   #7
da20captain
Rock God
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Member # 23339
Location: Beaufort, SC
Age: 41
Posts: 699
Feedback: 6 reviews
I am torn myself. My JK is a daily driver. I am leaning towards the Magnuson.
da20captain is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-06-2013, 07:38 PM   #8
eizenjin91
Rock God
 
eizenjin91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Member # 10362
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 771
Feedback: 1 reviews
With a rubicrawler and 5.38's I'm not worried about offroad it does just fine by itself. However on road my 3.8 with 40's is just absolutely effing horrible. Since I drive mine on the interstate everyday (even just to get a gallon of milk from the gas station) I want help solely with the upper RPM ranges at 50-80mph. Sounds like the Ripp would be better suited for that. Sounds like the Magnuson really shines in the offroad low rpm range
__________________
'10 JKU - RK Arms - King 12x2.5" Front/14x2.5" Rear Coilover's - 40" Trepador Sticky - Superior 5.38's - D60 Front/Sterling 10.5 Rear - Warn locking hubs - Genright Gas Tank - Offroad Evo Corner Armor, Sliders, Front Stinger Bumper, Tire Cage - Poison Spyder Body Armor, Evap Skid, Trail Cage, Brawler Rear Bumper - Skid Plates - Warn 9.5 - Xenon Flat Fenders - Rigid LED's - Driveshafts - Etc. - Daily Driver
eizenjin91 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-06-2013, 07:47 PM   #9
storch
Wheeler
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Member # 12467
Age: 52
Posts: 84
Feedback: 0 reviews
I added just the ripp headers and tuner, with a dynomax exhaust and K&N intake, it runs like it wants to move now, the only issue is premium fuel and at 60,000mi and 5:13 gears with 35" tires it seems to use even more oil.

yes this thing will burn more than a quart in 1000 mi?
I would think that a SC would only make it use more oil, the recomend wt is very thin, maybe a heavier oil would not go out the exhaust so fast?
storch is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 06:51 AM   #10
ALASHA
F5 Champ
 
ALASHA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Member # 6694
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 6,274
Feedback: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by eizenjin91 View Post
I want help solely with the upper RPM ranges at 50-80mph. Sounds like the Ripp would be better suited for that. Sounds like the Magnuson really shines in the offroad low rpm range
What rpm are you turning to do 50-80 mph with your set up?
__________________
www.totlinnovations.com
ALASHA is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 07:36 AM   #11
mschaffer66
Rock God
 
mschaffer66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Member # 11961
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 34
Posts: 1,585
Feedback: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by eizenjin91 View Post
With a rubicrawler and 5.38's I'm not worried about offroad it does just fine by itself. However on road my 3.8 with 40's is just absolutely effing horrible. Since I drive mine on the interstate everyday (even just to get a gallon of milk from the gas station) I want help solely with the upper RPM ranges at 50-80mph. Sounds like the Ripp would be better suited for that. Sounds like the Magnuson really shines in the offroad low rpm range
I was told once that a centrifugal supercharger is good for higher RPM power and the roots style blower is better for low end.
__________________
2007 Sahara Unlimited - Dana 60/14 Bolt - 5.38's with ARBs - 40x13.50x17 Goodyear MTRs - 3.5" Rock Krawler X Factor Plus - Rubi Rock Rails - XRC 10,000lb Winch
mschaffer66 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 07:56 AM   #12
ALASHA
F5 Champ
 
ALASHA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Member # 6694
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 6,274
Feedback: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by mschaffer66 View Post
I was told once that a centrifugal supercharger is good for higher RPM power and the roots style blower is better for low end.
Low to mid. Thats why roots style is used on EVERY OEM application. It delivers the most benefit across the widest rpm range.
__________________
www.totlinnovations.com
ALASHA is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 11:10 AM   #13
Acey
Rock God
 
Acey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Member # 20783
Location: West Georgia
Posts: 545
Feedback: 0 reviews
Proper gearing is a must for slow speed crawling.

The RIPP really shines on-road, which is where most of us probably spend our time anyways. I used to be scared of the interstate because the damn 3.8 couldn't get out of its own way. Then I put a RIPP SC on it, and I have plenty of power to accelerate and pass, even in the mountains.

Off-road, that's where 5.38 gears and the Rubi 4:1 TC come into play. Plenty enough torque to go over anything.
Note: I'm running 37's, 5.38's and an auto, for comparison. At 70mph, I'm showing 2450 RPM's.
__________________
2008 JK Rubi on big tires and stuff, RIPP supercharger.
Various dents and scratches.

Last edited by Acey; 05-07-2013 at 11:12 AM.
Acey is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 11:31 AM   #14
j-rod17
Rock God
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Member # 20005
Location: Farmington WV
Age: 32
Posts: 970
Feedback: 3 reviews
I have neither but have been looking into them heavily.

I am leaning towards the AEV or Sprintex. I like the lower end tq over the high end power from RIPP. I like that RIPP uses a vortech head unit and I know the RIPP would feel better on the street.

though I like Sprintex due to being able to run the OEM intake box since sometimes shit does happen and in this area may find yourself in water higher than you like. I sure dont want the RIPP to suck in water into that open element filter.
__________________
2008 JKU: continual work in progress
j-rod17 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 11:58 AM   #15
Acey
Rock God
 
Acey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Member # 20783
Location: West Georgia
Posts: 545
Feedback: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by j-rod17 View Post
though I like Sprintex due to being able to run the OEM intake box since sometimes shit does happen and in this area may find yourself in water higher than you like. I sure dont want the RIPP to suck in water into that open element filter.
You have a good point there, if you don't want to run a snorkel. However, water will still get into the OEM air box if you get into deep water.

I just avoid water. Too many other things that can get shorted if not properly water-proofed.
__________________
2008 JK Rubi on big tires and stuff, RIPP supercharger.
Various dents and scratches.
Acey is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 12:04 PM   #16
j-rod17
Rock God
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Member # 20005
Location: Farmington WV
Age: 32
Posts: 970
Feedback: 3 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey View Post
You have a good point there, if you don't want to run a snorkel. However, water will still get into the OEM air box if you get into deep water.

I just avoid water. Too many other things that can get shorted if not properly water-proofed.
agreed. my buddy blew his motor with a little water in stock box. but at least the stock box is a little safer than open filter. I try to avoid it as well...but sometimes you cant. LOL
__________________
2008 JKU: continual work in progress
j-rod17 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 12:45 PM   #17
planman
Rock God
 
planman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Member # 3083
Location: Billings, MT
Age: 47
Posts: 1,743
Feedback: 0 reviews
Both my wife's JK and my JK have RIPP superchargers.

With the high altitude pulley added to each kit, we are both very happy.

Most offroading is about gearing as much as anything. My wife's automatic is on 37s with 5.38s and the Rubi 4:1. My 6 speed is on 40s with 5.38s.

When we do sand or deep snow, we run higher rpms.

When we are rock crawling, it doesn't take much speed to hit 2500 rpm. With the RIPP, you can feel it building pressure/power as you accelerate into an obstacle that needs wheel spins. If you are in a very slow, technical setting, you don't need substantial extra power to idle through things.

If you are thinking of running a supercharger without regearing for rock crawling, know that that's how people break stuff.

The only downside to the supercharger approach is if you do longer daily commutes at speed in windy conditions, the JK cruise control is not responsive enough to handle the power from the supercharger--which leads to some surging. Neither my wife or I use our JKs more than for around town, wheeling, and the occasional expedition trip. We don't really notice the cruise control mismatch issue.

Here is video if the RIPP in action (skip forward to the rear view):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-8lEQUGilM&sns=em


Skip to 1:57 in this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZpZgMq5fMI&sns=em

Last edited by planman; 05-07-2013 at 12:49 PM.
planman is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 03:24 PM   #18
PieFace
Wheeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Member # 28799
Age: 34
Posts: 14
Feedback: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by bo9roadking View Post
This is speculation on my part based on researching an SC for my 2012 JKU when it becomes available.

I'm looking for more torque in the lower rpm range for easier starts getting my heavy JKU rolling and for rock crawling. The Magnuson will provide more of the torque at a lower rpm than the RIPP. When looking at the hp/tq curves for both, the RIPP doesn't produce much more than stock output until after 3k rpm from the dyno graphs that I've seen and then it starts to provide a significant boost. I don't drive my JKU above 3k rpm very often. With my needs, I think the Magnuson will work better because it starts giving a torque boost almost immediately.

Of course with the RIPP giving more power in the higher rpm curve, it would work well for where my JKU is gutless. When I'm on the Interstate and I need to pass someone, the RIPP has the upper hand over the Magnuson. The Magnuson has already given just about max hp/tq in the mid rpm range, where the RIPP is just warming up and ready to provide extra power on demand for the passing situation or on the long steep uphill grades where I need to maintain highway speeds.

As far as boost pressure, the higher the pressure, the more stress on the internal engine components. If you are looking at more than 8 psi, you won't have a reliable engine for long. IMO, your SC choice mainly depends on how you drive and what rpm range you keep your Jeep in the most.
I have a Supercharged 12, and I can tell you, I feel the RIPP S/C all over the powerband. It does go absolutley bonkers over 3k rpm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey View Post
Proper gearing is a must for slow speed crawling.

The RIPP really shines on-road, which is where most of us probably spend our time anyways. I used to be scared of the interstate because the damn 3.8 couldn't get out of its own way. Then I put a RIPP SC on it, and I have plenty of power to accelerate and pass, even in the mountains.

Off-road, that's where 5.38 gears and the Rubi 4:1 TC come into play. Plenty enough torque to go over anything.
Note: I'm running 37's, 5.38's and an auto, for comparison. At 70mph, I'm showing 2450 RPM's.
the RIPP shines off-road too. You just need to know how to apply its power. I took the truck cross country to Moab as soon as the S/C was bolted on and in 4 LO 1st gear, I let the RPM build and she will climb anything. No need to punch the gas. I can completely creep up very steep inclines.
PieFace is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 05:56 PM   #19
JK Timmay
Granite Guru
 
JK Timmay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Member # 10655
Location: Southern California
Posts: 479
Garage
Feedback: 3 reviews
This is great info for us who are on the fence as to which system to choose. Keep it coming!
__________________
08 Rescue Green Rubicon Unlimited
PSC Crusher Flares front and rear and Brawler Lite Front
Crusher Corners
2.5 RK Max Travel with Fox Shocks and 35 in. MTRs
JK Timmay is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 06:30 PM   #20
da20captain
Rock God
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Member # 23339
Location: Beaufort, SC
Age: 41
Posts: 699
Feedback: 6 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by JK Timmay View Post
This is great info for us who are on the fence as to which system to choose. Keep it coming!
Agreed! Still on the fence for me too!
da20captain is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 07:37 PM   #21
PieFace
Wheeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Member # 28799
Age: 34
Posts: 14
Feedback: 0 reviews
Im trying to find a hemi to race on tape.

once I do we will check on your "fence" status.
PieFace is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 08:21 PM   #22
Quacktacular
Lost
 
Quacktacular's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Member # 21360
Location: Moab, UT
Age: 33
Posts: 108
Feedback: 0 reviews
I just installed my Ripp kit about 1100 miles ago. I too am running the high altitude pulley and have to agree with the comment of, "It does go absolutley bonkers over 3k rpm."

I too considered the Sprintex for the roots style (Magnuson was out of the question due to cost), but there were several factors I considered.

1. My true need for power was on the highway. In low range I rarely though "If only I had more power..." While on the highway I constantly felt this way.

2. I read through the install manual for the Sprintex kit and determined that I didn't want to swap the valve covers.

3. Tuning for the Sprintex appears to still need a little work.

My install was pretty straight forward. I recently posted a writeup of my install:

http://www.jkowners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=92619
__________________
Jason - KB0WLI
2008 Black JKU Rubicon
RIPP Stage 2, RockHard Bumpers, RockKrawler 3.5" X-Factor & Fox 2.0's, Nitro Sleeved, Artec Trussed & Gusseted, 37x12.50-17 Falken Wild Peaks wrapped around 17x9 XD Addics
Quacktacular is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-07-2013, 09:15 PM   #23
Acey
Rock God
 
Acey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Member # 20783
Location: West Georgia
Posts: 545
Feedback: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by PieFace View Post
I have a Supercharged 12, and I can tell you, I feel the RIPP S/C all over the powerband. It does go absolutley bonkers over 3k rpm.



the RIPP shines off-road too. You just need to know how to apply its power. I took the truck cross country to Moab as soon as the S/C was bolted on and in 4 LO 1st gear, I let the RPM build and she will climb anything. No need to punch the gas. I can completely creep up very steep inclines.
I totally agree. Proper gearing is a must for low speed (i.e. rock crawling). Put it in 4 LO, and you already have enough power to break stuff.

I feel the increase in power down low with my RIPP. Definitely a lot more than stock.

With the RIPP, once you hit about 2500 RPM, it's like lighting off an afterburner...WARP 9, ENGAGE! I scared myself the first time I got on the highway and floored it. (Scared the wife too, LMAO!). I spend more time on the street than off-road. So, street-speed power is what I honestly needed. I am happy I went RIPP.
__________________
2008 JK Rubi on big tires and stuff, RIPP supercharger.
Various dents and scratches.
Acey is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-08-2013, 04:18 AM   #24
usmcdoc14
Fistfull of Boomstick
 
usmcdoc14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Member # 206
Location: Norfawk, va
Posts: 3,874
Feedback: 1 reviews
I have not seen the AEV/Magnuson tested by anyone but AEV, I would like to see more on it before giving input.
__________________
Doc-14 Tactical Products:
When it absolutely, positively needs to be made from random crap found in the back of my garage.

usmcdoc14 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-28-2014, 11:10 AM   #25
jvandy50
V8 dreams
 
jvandy50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Member # 11593
Location: jonesboro, ar
Posts: 3,156
Feedback: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by planman View Post
If you are thinking of running a supercharger without regearing for rock crawling, know that that's how people break stuff
Can you elaborate on this a bit? I still have 3.73 and have always been afraid to goto 5.13 because of the d30. Plus what it costs to regear around here, for a few thousand more I could just get new axles.
__________________
2010 Silver JKU

www.HIDprojectors.com
jvandy50 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JKowners.com : Jeep Wrangler JK Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.